Data Ethics with Eric Mullis

Data Literacy

Monday: Data Ethics

Monday Presentation

Wednesday: Data Ethics

Wednesday Presentation

Friday: Data Ethics Workshop.

  • In Class as a domain group.
    • Choose a hypothetical dataset associated with your domain (e.g., a dataset of faces and names for facial recognition). Try to be creative here. For instance, if your domain is politics, you might consider a dataset of voter information.
    • Once you have decided on a dataset, apply the ethical considerations discussed on Monday and Wednesday for your dataset.
    • Specifically apply the PFAT rubric.
    • Answer the following questions:
      1. Privacy: Does the dataset contain any personally identifiable information (PII)? If so, how is it protected? If not, could it be used to identify individuals?
      2. Fairness: Could this data arbitrarily discriminate against any groups or be used to do so?
      3. Accountability: What are possible negative consequences related to the data, and how can you respond to them?
      4. Transparency: How would you explain the dataset to a user?
      5. Are there any values or assumptions embedded in the dataset? Could there be based on how it is collected, organized, or analyzed?
  • End of Class:
    • Present your findings to the class.
    • Do not present your findings as a list of answers to the questions above. Instead, present your findings as a narrative that explains the dataset, the ethical considerations, and the implications of those considerations. Weaved into that discussion should be the answers to the questions above.
    • Think of it as a short 3-minute presentation to a group of stakeholders.

Worshop Rubric

Criteria Points (0-5)
Does the group effectively discuss the fairness of the dataset?
Does the group consider and foresee possible negative consequences of the dataset and respond to them?
Does the group consider how to explain the dataset to a user?
Does the group identify values or assumptions embedded in the dataset?
Does the group narrate these considerations in a coherent and engaging manner?